Federally chartered corporation | 000-50231 | 52-0883107 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction | (Commission | (IRS Employer | ||
of incorporation) | File Number) | Identification Number) |
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW | 20016 | |
Washington, DC | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) | ||
o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) | ||
o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) | ||
o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 2.02 | Results of Operations and Financial Condition. |
Item 7.01 | Regulation FD Disclosure. |
Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION | ||||||
By | /s/ David C. Hisey | |||||
Executive Vice President and Deputy Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |||
99.1 | News release, dated May 10, 2010 |
|||
99.2 | Impact of New Accounting Standards on Fannie Maes 2010
First Quarter Form 10-Q: Overview and FAQ |
|||
99.3 | 2010 First Quarter Credit Supplement presentation, dated
May 10, 2010 |
Contacts:
|
Todd Davenport 202-752-5115 |
|
Number:
|
5024a | |
Date:
|
May 10, 2010 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 1 |
| A significant increase in loans and debt and a decrease in trading and available-for-sale securities. | ||
| Separate presentation of the elements of the consolidated MBS trusts (such as mortgage loans, debt, accrued interest receivable and payable) on the face of our condensed consolidated balance sheets. | ||
| Significant increase in allowance for loan losses and significant decrease in reserve for guaranty losses. | ||
| Elimination of substantially all previously recorded guaranty assets and guaranty obligations. |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 2 |
| A significant increase in interest income and interest expense attributable to the assets and liabilities of the consolidated MBS trusts, and a separate presentation of the elements of the consolidated MBS trusts (interest income and interest expense) on the face of our condensed consolidated statements of operations. | ||
| Reclassification of the substantial majority of guaranty fee income and trust management income to interest income. | ||
| A decrease to the provision for credit losses (which consists of the provision for loan losses and provision for guaranty losses) and a corresponding decrease in net interest income due to recognizing interest expense on the debt of consolidated MBS trusts and not accruing interest income on underlying nonperforming consolidated loans. | ||
| Elimination of fair value losses on credit-impaired loans acquired from MBS trusts we have consolidated, as the underlying loans in our MBS trusts are already recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. | ||
| Our portfolio securitization transactions that reflect transfers of assets to consolidated MBS trusts do not qualify as sales, thereby reducing the amount we recognize as portfolio securitization gains and losses. We also no longer recognize gains or losses on the sale from our portfolio of available-for-sale MBS securities that were issued by consolidated MBS trusts, because these securities are eliminated in consolidation. | ||
| We no longer recognize fair value gains or losses on trading MBS that were issued by consolidated MBS trusts, which reduces the amount of securities subject to recognition of changes in fair value in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) (1) | 1Q10 | 4Q09 | Variance | 1Q10 | 1Q09 | Variance | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 2,789 | $ | 3,697 | $ | (908 | ) | $ | 2,789 | $ | 3,248 | $ | (459 | ) | ||||||||||
Guaranty fee income |
54 | 1,877 | (1,823 | ) | 54 | 1,752 | (1,698 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Fee and other income |
179 | 190 | (11 | ) | 179 | 192 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
3,022 | 5,764 | (2,742 | ) | 3,022 | 5,192 | (2,170 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment gains, net |
166 | 495 | (329 | ) | 166 | 223 | (57 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
(236 | ) | (2,516 | ) | 2,280 | (236 | ) | (5,653 | ) | 5,417 | ||||||||||||||
Fair value losses, net |
(1,705 | ) | (638 | ) | (1,067 | ) | (1,705 | ) | (1,460 | ) | (245 | ) | ||||||||||||
Losses from partnership investments |
(58 | ) | (5,287 | ) | 5,229 | (58 | ) | (357 | ) | 299 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative expenses |
(605 | ) | (612 | ) | 7 | (605 | ) | (523 | ) | (82 | ) | |||||||||||||
Credit-related
expenses (2) |
(11,884 | ) | (11,920 | ) | 36 | (11,884 | ) | (20,872 | ) | 8,988 | ||||||||||||||
Other non-interest expenses |
(296 | ) | (701 | ) | 405 | (296 | ) | (358 | ) | 62 | ||||||||||||||
Net losses and expenses |
(14,618 | ) | (21,179 | ) | 6,561 | (14,618 | ) | (29,000 | ) | 14,382 | ||||||||||||||
Loss before federal income taxes |
(11,596 | ) | (15,415 | ) | 3,819 | (11,596 | ) | (23,808 | ) | 12,212 | ||||||||||||||
Benefit for federal income taxes |
67 | 242 | (175 | ) | 67 | 623 | (556 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(11,529 | ) | (15,173 | ) | 3,644 | (11,529 | ) | (23,185 | ) | 11,656 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | (1 | ) | 17 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to Fannie Mae |
$ | (11,530 | ) | $ | (15,175 | ) | $ | 3,645 | $ | (11,530 | ) | $ | (23,168 | ) | $ | 11,638 | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(1,527 | ) | (1,151 | ) | (376 | ) | (1,527 | ) | (29 | ) | (1,498 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (13,057 | ) | $ | (16,326 | ) | $ | 3,269 | $ | (13,057 | ) | $ | (23,197 | ) | $ | 10,140 | ||||||||
Diluted loss per common share |
$ | (2.29 | ) | $ | (2.87 | ) | $ | 0.58 | $ | (2.29 | ) | $ | (4.09 | ) | $ | 1.80 | ||||||||
(1) | Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. | |
(2) | Consists of provision for loan losses, provision (benefit) for guaranty losses, and foreclosed properly expense (income). |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 3 |
| Net interest income was $2.8 billion, down 25 percent from $3.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009. The assets and liabilities of our newly consolidated trusts increased both our interest income and our interest expense, but our net interest income decreased because we do not recognize interest income on the mortgage loans of consolidated trusts that have been placed on nonaccrual status. In the first quarter of 2010, interest income that we did not recognize for nonaccrual mortgage loans was $2.7 billion. | |
| Guaranty fee income was $54 million, down substantially from $1.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009. Under the new accounting standards, we now recognize both contractual guaranty fees and the amortization of deferred cash fees received after December 31, 2009 through interest income, thereby reducing guaranty fee income to only those amounts related to unconsolidated trusts and other credit enhancement arrangements, such as our long-term standby commitments. |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 4 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 5 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 6 |
| Loan modifications, including permanent HAMP modifications, of 93,756, compared with 41,759 in the fourth quarter of 2009. This figure does not include HAMP modifications in trial periods. | ||
| Repayment plans/forbearances completed of 8,682, compared with 5,353 in the fourth quarter of 2009. | ||
| HomeSaver Advance loans of 2,588, compared with 2,759 in the fourth quarter of 2009. | ||
| Preforeclosure sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure of 17,326, compared with 13,459 in the fourth quarter of 2009. |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 7 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 8 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 9 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 10 |
First-Quarter 2010 Results | 11 |
As of | ||||||||
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (includes cash of consolidated trusts
of $446 and $2,092, respectively)
|
$ | 30,477 | $ | 6,812 | ||||
Restricted cash (includes restricted cash of consolidated trusts
of $42,731 and $-, respectively)
|
45,479 | 3,070 | ||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell or similar arrangements
|
62,446 | 53,684 | ||||||
Investments in securities:
|
||||||||
Trading, at fair value (includes securities of consolidated
trusts of $32 and $5,599, respectively)
|
72,529 | 111,939 | ||||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value (includes securities of consolidated trusts of
$624 and $10,513, respectively, and securities pledged as
collateral that may be sold or repledged of $- and $1,148,
respectively)
|
108,667 | 237,728 | ||||||
Total investments in securities
|
181,196 | 349,667 | ||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
|
980 | 18,462 | ||||||
Loans held for investment, at amortized cost
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
309,991 | 256,434 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts (includes loans pledged as collateral
that may be sold or repledged of $2,895 and $1,947, respectively)
|
2,679,336 | 129,590 | ||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
2,989,327 | 386,024 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(60,569 | ) | (9,925 | ) | ||||
Total loans held for investment, net of allowance
|
2,928,758 | 376,099 | ||||||
Total mortgage loans
|
2,929,738 | 394,561 | ||||||
Advances to lenders
|
4,151 | 5,449 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
4,333 | 3,774 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
13,939 | 519 | ||||||
Allowance for accrued interest receivable
|
(7,611 | ) | (536 | ) | ||||
Total accrued interest receivable, net of allowance
|
10,661 | 3,757 | ||||||
Acquired property, net
|
12,369 | 9,142 | ||||||
Derivative assets, at fair value
|
435 | 1,474 | ||||||
Guaranty assets
|
473 | 8,356 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net
|
1,906 | 909 | ||||||
Partnership investments
|
1,853 | 2,372 | ||||||
Servicer and MBS trust receivable
|
679 | 18,329 | ||||||
Other assets
|
11,892 | 11,559 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 3,293,755 | $ | 869,141 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accrued interest payable:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
$ | 5,006 | $ | 4,951 | ||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
10,558 | 29 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
180 | | ||||||
Short-term debt:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
207,822 | 200,437 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
6,343 | | ||||||
Long-term debt:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae (includes debt at fair value of $3,258 and $3,274,
respectively)
|
576,307 | 567,950 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts (includes debt at fair value of $310 and
$-, respectively)
|
2,472,192 | 6,167 | ||||||
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
|
957 | 1,029 | ||||||
Reserve for guaranty losses (includes $33 and $4,772,
respectively, related to Fannie Mae MBS included in Investments
in securities)
|
233 | 54,430 | ||||||
Guaranty obligations
|
827 | 13,996 | ||||||
Partnership liabilities
|
2,020 | 2,541 | ||||||
Servicer and MBS trust payable
|
9,799 | 25,872 | ||||||
Other liabilities
|
9,882 | 7,020 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,302,126 | 884,422 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
|
| | ||||||
Fannie Mae stockholders equity (deficit):
|
||||||||
Senior preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares issued and
outstanding
|
76,200 | 60,900 | ||||||
Preferred stock, 700,000,000 shares are
authorized578,598,631 and 579,735,457 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively
|
20,291 | 20,348 | ||||||
Common stock, no par value, no maximum
authorization1,267,426,377 and 1,265,674,761 shares
issued, respectively; 1,115,813,353 and
1,113,358,051 shares outstanding, respectively
|
665 | 664 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
604 | 2,083 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(95,061 | ) | (90,237 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(3,754 | ) | (1,732 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 151,613,024 and
152,316,710 shares, respectively
|
(7,396 | ) | (7,398 | ) | ||||
Total Fannie Mae stockholders deficit
|
(8,451 | ) | (15,372 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest
|
80 | 91 | ||||||
Total deficit
|
(8,371 | ) | (15,281 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
$ | 3,293,755 | $ | 869,141 | ||||
12 |
For the Three |
||||||||
Months Ended |
||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest income:
|
||||||||
Trading securities
|
$ | 315 | $ | 990 | ||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
1,473 | 3,721 | ||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
3,298 | 4,707 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
34,321 | 891 | ||||||
Other
|
39 | 127 | ||||||
Total interest income
|
39,446 | 10,436 | ||||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||
Short-term debt:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
116 | 1,107 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
2 | | ||||||
Long-term debt:
|
||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
5,081 | 5,992 | ||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
31,458 | 89 | ||||||
Total interest expense
|
36,657 | 7,188 | ||||||
Net interest income
|
2,789 | 3,248 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(11,939 | ) | (2,509 | ) | ||||
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses
|
(9,150 | ) | 739 | |||||
Guaranty fee income (includes imputed interest of $29 and $150
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively)
|
54 | 1,752 | ||||||
Investment gains, net
|
166 | 223 | ||||||
Other-than-temporary
impairments
|
(186 | ) | (5,653 | ) | ||||
Noncredit portion of
other-than-temporary
impairments recognized in other comprehensive loss
|
(50 | ) | | |||||
Net
other-than-temporary
impairments
|
(236 | ) | (5,653 | ) | ||||
Fair value losses, net
|
(1,705 | ) | (1,460 | ) | ||||
Debt extinguishment losses, net (includes debt extinguishment
losses related to consolidated trusts of $69 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010)
|
(124 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||
Losses from partnership investments
|
(58 | ) | (357 | ) | ||||
Fee and other income
|
179 | 192 | ||||||
Non-interest loss
|
(1,724 | ) | (5,382 | ) | ||||
Administrative expenses:
|
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits
|
324 | 293 | ||||||
Professional services
|
194 | 143 | ||||||
Occupancy expenses
|
41 | 48 | ||||||
Other administrative expenses
|
46 | 39 | ||||||
Total administrative expenses
|
605 | 523 | ||||||
Provision (benefit) for guaranty losses
|
(36 | ) | 17,825 | |||||
Foreclosed property expense (income)
|
(19 | ) | 538 | |||||
Other expenses
|
172 | 279 | ||||||
Total expenses
|
722 | 19,165 | ||||||
Loss before federal income taxes
|
(11,596 | ) | (23,808 | ) | ||||
Benefit for federal income taxes
|
(67 | ) | (623 | ) | ||||
Net loss
|
(11,529 | ) | (23,185 | ) | ||||
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
(1 | ) | 17 | |||||
Net loss attributable to Fannie Mae
|
(11,530 | ) | (23,168 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends
|
(1,527 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$ | (13,057 | ) | $ | (23,197 | ) | ||
Loss per share Basic and Diluted
|
$ | (2.29 | ) | $ | (4.09 | ) | ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic and
Diluted
|
5,692 | 5,666 |
13 |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (11,529 | ) | $ | (23,185 | ) | ||
Amortization of debt of Fannie Mae cost basis adjustments
|
364 | 1,326 | ||||||
Amortization of debt of consolidated trusts cost basis
adjustments
|
(68 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan and guaranty losses
|
11,903 | 20,334 | ||||||
Valuation (gains) losses
|
(990 | ) | 5,403 | |||||
Current and deferred federal income taxes
|
(67 | ) | (1,713 | ) | ||||
Derivatives fair value adjustments
|
891 | (3 | ) | |||||
Purchases of loans held for sale
|
(17 | ) | (33,332 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from repayments of loans held for sale
|
9 | 295 | ||||||
Net change in trading securities, excluding non-cash transfers
|
(31,679 | ) | 1,949 | |||||
Other, net
|
(1,720 | ) | (1,417 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(32,903 | ) | (30,345 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases of trading securities held for investment
|
(6,695 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from maturities of trading securities held for
investment
|
805 | 2,656 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading securities held for investment
|
15,068 | 38 | ||||||
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
(107 | ) | (22,697 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
4,120 | 9,731 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
securities
|
6,154 | 53,972 | ||||||
Purchases of loans held for investment
|
(19,863 | ) | (9,859 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from repayments of loans held for investment of Fannie
Mae
|
3,250 | 10,974 | ||||||
Proceeds from repayments of loans held for investment of
consolidated trusts
|
130,226 | 3,020 | ||||||
Net change in restricted cash
|
3,174 | | ||||||
Advances to lenders
|
(10,338 | ) | (22,877 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposition of acquired property
|
7,678 | 4,554 | ||||||
Reimbursements to servicers for loan advances
|
(11,748 | ) | (4,434 | ) | ||||
Net change in federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell or similar arrangements
|
(9,135 | ) | 13,405 | |||||
Other, net
|
(382 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
112,207 | 38,288 | ||||||
Cash flows used in financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt of Fannie Mae
|
192,421 | 360,173 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt of consolidated trusts
|
3,332 | | ||||||
Payments to redeem short-term debt of Fannie Mae
|
(185,156 | ) | (417,553 | ) | ||||
Payments to redeem short-term debt of consolidated trusts
|
(9,513 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of Fannie Mae
|
100,604 | 105,057 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of consolidated trusts
|
83,692 | | ||||||
Payments to redeem long-term debt of Fannie Mae
|
(92,355 | ) | (65,290 | ) | ||||
Payments to redeem long-term debt of consolidated trusts
|
(162,617 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from senior preferred stock purchase agreement with
Treasury
|
15,300 | 15,200 | ||||||
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
180 | (65 | ) | |||||
Other, net
|
(1,527 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(55,639 | ) | (2,630 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
23,665 | 5,313 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
6,812 | 17,933 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 30,477 | $ | 23,246 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 40,660 | $ | 7,806 | ||||
Income taxes
|
| 848 | ||||||
Non-cash activities (excluding transition-related
impacts see Note 2):
|
||||||||
Mortgage loans acquired by assuming debt
|
$ | 130,042 | $ | 13 | ||||
Net transfers from mortgage loans held for investment of
consolidated trusts to mortgage loans held for investment of
Fannie Mae
|
55,074 | | ||||||
Transfers from advances to lenders to investments in securities
|
| 13,131 | ||||||
Transfers from advances to lenders to loans held for
investment of consolidated trusts
|
11,012 | | ||||||
Net transfers from mortgage loans to acquired property
|
2,233 | 916 |
14 |
Fannie Mae Stockholders Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained |
Accumulated |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding |
Additional |
Earnings |
Other |
Non |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior |
Senior |
Preferred |
Common |
Paid-In |
(Accumulated |
Comprehensive |
Treasury |
Controlling |
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Preferred | Common | Preferred | Stock | Stock | Capital | Deficit) | Loss | Stock | Interest | (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
1 | 597 | 1,085 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 21,222 | $ | 650 | $ | 3,621 | $ | (26,790 | ) | $ | (7,673 | ) | $ | (7,344 | ) | $ | 157 | $ | (15,157 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in investment in noncontrolling interest
|
| | | | | | | | | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
| | | | | | | (23,168 | ) | | | (17 | ) | (23,185 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in net unrealized losses on available-for sale
securities (net of tax of $271)
|
| | | | | | | | 505 | | | 505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments
recognized in net loss (net of tax of $1,979)
|
| | | | | | | | 3,674 | 3,674 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net loss (net
of tax of $17)
|
| | | | | | | | 32 | | | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on guaranty assets and guaranty fee
buy-ups
|
| | | | | | | | 29 | | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost and actuarial gains, net of amortization for
defined benefit plans
|
| | | | | | | | 15 | | | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss
|
(18,930 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior preferred stock dividends
|
| | | | | | (25 | ) | | | | | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase to senior preferred liquidation preference
|
| | | 15,200 | | | | | | | | 15,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
| (12 | ) | 19 | | (593 | ) | 10 | 583 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
| | 1 | | | | 19 | 1 | | (34 | ) | | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
1 | 585 | 1,105 | $ | 16,200 | $ | 20,629 | $ | 660 | $ | 4,198 | $ | (49,957 | ) | $ | (3,418 | ) | $ | (7,378 | ) | $ | 137 | $ | (18,929 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
1 | 580 | 1,113 | $ | 60,900 | $ | 20,348 | $ | 664 | $ | 2,083 | $ | (90,237 | ) | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (7,398 | ) | $ | 91 | $ | (15,281 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect from the adoption of the accounting standards
on transfers of financial assets and consolidation
|
| | | | | | | 6,706 | (3,394 | ) | | (14 | ) | 3,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2010, adjusted
|
1 | 580 | 1,113 | 60,900 | 20,348 | 664 | 2,083 | (83,531 | ) | (5,126 | ) | (7,398 | ) | 77 | (11,983 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in investment in noncontrolling interest
|
| | | | | | | | | | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
| | | | | | | (11,530 | ) | | | 1 | (11,529 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in net unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
securities, (net of tax of $710)
|
| | | | | | | | 1,318 | | | 1,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments
recognized in net loss (net of tax of $81)
|
| | | | | | | | 155 | | | 155 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net loss (net
of tax of $56)
|
| | | | | | | | (103 | ) | | | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost and actuarial gains, net of amortization for
defined benefit plans
|
| | | | | | | | 2 | | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss
|
(10,157 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior preferred stock dividends
|
| | | | | | (1,527 | ) | | | | | (1,527 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase to senior preferred liquidation preference
|
| | | 15,300 | | | | | | | | 15,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
| (1 | ) | 2 | | (57 | ) | 1 | 56 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
| | 1 | | | | (8 | ) | | | 2 | | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
1 | 579 | 1,116 | $ | 76,200 | $ | 20,291 | $ | 665 | $ | 604 | $ | (95,061 | ) | $ | (3,754 | ) | $ | (7,396 | ) | $ | 80 | $ | (8,371 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15 |
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP |
GAAP |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying |
Fair Value |
Estimated |
Carrying |
Fair Value |
Estimated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value | Adjustment(2) | Fair Value | Value | Adjustment(2) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 75,956 | $ | | $ | 75,956 | (3) | $ | 9,882 | $ | | $ | 9,882 | (3) | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell or similar arrangements
|
62,446 | | 62,446 | (3) | 53,684 | (28 | ) | 53,656 | (3) | |||||||||||||||
Trading securities
|
72,529 | | 72,529 | (3) | 111,939 | | 111,939 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
108,667 | | 108,667 | (3) | 237,728 | | 237,728 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
980 | 2 | 982 | (3) | 18,462 | 153 | 18,615 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan
losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
284,316 | (13,532 | ) | 270,784 | (3) | 246,509 | (5,209 | ) | 241,300 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
2,644,442 | (4,998 | )(4) | 2,639,444 | (3) | 129,590 | (45 | ) | 129,545 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage loans
|
2,929,738 | (18,528 | ) | 2,911,210 | 394,561 | (5,101 | ) | 389,460 | ||||||||||||||||
Advances to lenders
|
4,151 | (279 | ) | 3,872 | (3) | 5,449 | (305 | ) | 5,144 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Derivative assets at fair value
|
435 | | 435 | (3) | 1,474 | | 1,474 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Guaranty assets and
buy-ups, net
|
473 | 337 | 810 | (3)(5) | 9,520 | 5,104 | 14,624 | (3)(5) | ||||||||||||||||
Total financial assets
|
3,254,395 | (18,470 | ) | 3,235,925 | (3) | 824,237 | (330 | ) | 823,907 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Master servicing assets and credit enhancements
|
573 | 4,354 | 4,927 | (5)(6) | 651 | 5,917 | 6,568 | (5)(6) | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
38,787 | (263 | ) | 38,524 | (6) | 44,253 | 373 | 44,626 | (6) | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 3,293,755 | $ | (14,379 | ) | $ | 3,279,376 | $ | 869,141 | $ | 5,960 | $ | 875,101 | |||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
$ | 180 | $ | | $ | 180 | (3) | $ | | $ | | $ | | (3) | ||||||||||
Short-term debt:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
207,822 | 44 | 207,866 | (3) | 200,437 | 56 | 200,493 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
6,343 | (1 | ) | 6,342 | (3) | | | | (3) | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of Fannie Mae
|
576,307 | (7) | 20,528 | 596,835 | (3) | 567,950 | (7) | 19,473 | 587,423 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Of consolidated trusts
|
2,472,192 | (7) | 98,762 | (4) | 2,570,954 | (3) | 6,167 | (7) | 143 | 6,310 | (3) | |||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities at fair value
|
957 | | 957 | (3) | 1,029 | | 1,029 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Guaranty obligations
|
827 | 3,497 | 4,324 | (3) | 13,996 | 124,586 | 138,582 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities
|
3,264,628 | 122,830 | 3,387,458 | (3) | 789,579 | 144,258 | 933,837 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
37,498 | (447 | ) | 37,051 | (8) | 94,843 | (54,878 | ) | 39,965 | (8) | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,302,126 | 122,383 | 3,424,509 | 884,422 | 89,380 | 973,802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity (deficit):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fannie Mae stockholders equity (deficit):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior
preferred(9)
|
76,200 | | 76,200 | 60,900 | | 60,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
20,291 | (19,485 | ) | 806 | 20,348 | (19,629 | ) | 719 | ||||||||||||||||
Common
|
(104,942 | ) | (117,277 | ) | (222,219 | ) | (96,620 | ) | (63,791 | ) | (160,411 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Fannie Mae stockholders deficit/non-GAAP fair
value of net assets
|
$ | (8,451 | ) | $ | (136,762 | ) | $ | (145,213 | ) | $ | (15,372 | ) | $ | (83,420 | ) | $ | (98,792 | ) | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests
|
80 | | 80 | 91 | | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deficit
|
(8,371 | ) | (136,762 | ) | (145,133 | ) | (15,281 | ) | (83,420 | ) | (98,701 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
$ | 3,293,755 | $ | (14,379 | ) | $ | 3,279,376 | $ | 869,141 | $ | 5,960 | $ | 875,101 | |||||||||||
16 |
(1) | Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. | |
(2) | Each of the amounts listed as a fair value adjustment represents the difference between the carrying value included in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets and our best judgment of the estimated fair value of the listed item. | |
(3) | We determined the estimated fair value of these financial instruments in accordance with the fair value accounting standard as described in Note 16, Fair Value. | |
(4) | Fair value exceeds the carrying value of consolidated loans and debt of consolidated trusts due to the fact that the loans and debt were consolidated in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheet at unpaid principal balance. Also impacting the difference between fair value and carrying value of the consolidated loans is the credit component of the loan. This credit component is reflected in the net guarantee obligation, which is included in the consolidated loan fair value, but was presented as a separate line item in our fair value balance sheet in prior periods. | |
(5) | In our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets, we report the guaranty assets as a separate line item. Other guaranty related assets are within the Other assets line items and they include buy-ups, master servicing assets and credit enhancements. On a GAAP basis, our guaranty assets totaled $473 million and $8.4 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The associated buy-ups totaled $0.6 million and $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(6) | The line items Master servicing assets and credit enhancements and Other assets together consist of the assets presented on the following six line items in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets: (a) Total accrued interest receivable, net of allowance; (b) Acquired property, net; (c) Deferred tax assets, net; (d) Partnership investments; (e) Servicer and MBS trust receivable and (f) Other assets. The carrying value of these items in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets together totaled $39.4 billion and $46.1 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We deduct the carrying value of the buy-ups associated with our guaranty obligation, which totaled $0.6 million and $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, from Other assets reported in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets because buy-ups are a financial instrument that we combine with guaranty assets in our disclosure in Note 16, Fair Value. We have estimated the fair value of master servicing assets and credit enhancements based on our fair value methodologies described in Note 16. | |
(7) | Includes certain long-term debt instruments that we elected to report at fair value in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets of $3.3 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. | |
(8) | The line item Other liabilities consists of the liabilities presented on the following six line items in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets: (a) Accrued interest payable of Fannie Mae; (b) Accrued interest payable of consolidated trusts; (c) Reserve for guaranty losses; (d) Partnership liabilities; (e) Servicer and MBS trust payable; and (f) Other liabilities. The carrying value of these items in our GAAP condensed consolidated balance sheets together totaled $37.5 billion and $94.8 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The GAAP carrying values of these other liabilities generally approximate fair value. We assume that certain other liabilities, such as deferred revenues, have no fair value. Although we report the Reserve for guaranty losses as a separate line item in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, it is incorporated into and reported as part of the fair value of our guaranty obligations in our non-GAAP supplemental consolidated fair value balance sheets. | |
(9) | The amount included in estimated fair value of the senior preferred stock is the liquidation preference, which is the same as the GAAP carrying value, and does not reflect fair value. |
17 |
1
Nonaccruals: We do not recognize interest income on nonperforming loans of consolidated trusts that are more than 60 days delinquent. However, we continue to recognize interest expense on these nonaccrual loans. Because the amount of these loans on our balance sheet increased with consolidation, we saw a significant increase in interest income that was not recognized in our statement of operations. Prior to January 1, 2010, the delinquent interest payments on the loans underlying our unconsolidated MBS trusts were considered in the determination of our combined reserve for credit losses. After consolidation, our combined reserve for credit losses will no longer need to contemplate these delinquent interest payments. The unrecognized income on nonperforming loans was $2.7 billion, or 33 basis points of yield, in the first quarter of 2010 compared with $233 million, or 10 basis points of yield, in the first quarter of 2009. |
2
Yield: Net interest income now includes revenues previously included in guaranty fees related to the previously unconsolidated MBS trusts, which collectively have a much lower yield than revenues generated by our retained portfolio. For the first quarter of 2009, the interest earning assets had a net interest yield of 145 basis points on average assets of $895.6 billion; for the first quarter of 2010, the interest earning assets had a net interest yield of 34 basis points on average assets of $3.2 trillion. |
Financial Statement | Accounting and Presentation Changes | |||
Balance Sheet
|
| Significant increase in loans and debt and significant decrease in trading and available-for-sale securities | ||
| Separate presentation of the elements of the consolidated MBS trusts (such as mortgage loans, debt, accrued interest receivable and payable) on the face of our condensed consolidated balance sheets | |||
| Reclassification of substantially all of the previously recorded reserve for guaranty losses to allowance for loan losses and accrued interest receivable | |||
| Elimination of substantially all previously recorded guaranty assets and guaranty obligations | |||
Statement of Operations
|
| Significant increase in interest income and interest expense attributable to the assets and liabilities of the consolidated MBS trusts | ||
| Decrease to provision for credit losses (comprised of provision for loan losses and provision for guaranty losses) and a corresponding decrease in net interest income due to recognizing interest expense on the debt of consolidated MBS trusts when we are not accruing interest income on underlying nonperforming consolidated loans | |||
| Separate presentation of the elements of the consolidated MBS trusts (interest income and interest expense) on the face of our condensed consolidated statements of operations | |||
| Reclassification of the substantial majority of guaranty fee income and trust management income to interest income | |||
| Elimination of fair value losses on credit-impaired loans acquired from MBS trusts we have consolidated, as the underlying loans in our MBS trusts are already recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets | |||
Statement of Cash Flows
|
| Significant change in the amounts of cash flows from investing and financing activities |
3
1) | Does consolidation affect the presentation of previously reported financial results? | |
No. Because we adopted the new accounting standards prospectively, there is no impact on historical results. Readers of our Form 10-Q should note that, as a result of the prospective adoption of the new standards, our Balance Sheet, Statement of Operations and Statement of Cash Flows are not presented on a comparable basis to prior periods. {See Note 2, and PART I, Item 2, Executive Summary} | ||
2) | Does the adoption of the new accounting standards change your overall risk position and do you now own the assets held in consolidated trusts? | |
No. The assets that underlie each MBS trust continue to be legally isolated from Fannie Mae for the benefit of MBS certificateholders. Accordingly, the new accounting standards do not change the economic risk to our business, specifically our exposure to liquidity, credit, and interest rate risks. Our exposure to the risk associated with our guaranty of the timely payment of principal and interest on loans in our MBS trusts is not affected by whether those loans are recorded on- or off-balance sheet. We are consolidating the MBS trusts we guarantee based on whether we control the trust, which reflects our assessment of our power to influence the trusts performance and our exposure to potential losses through our guaranty. | ||
3) | Does the additional debt added through consolidation increase liquidity risk? | |
The Companys legal obligations and funding requirements are unchanged by the new accounting. We continue to fund our business through issuances of short-term and long-term debt securities. This is separate and distinct from mortgage loans originated by lenders in the primary mortgage market that we securitize into Fannie Mae MBS. Accordingly, while the accounting for the MBS trusts has changed, the liquidity management and funding risk of the company are unchanged. | ||
4) | Do you quantify your results of operations, including net loss and per share amounts, without showing the effect of the new accounting standards? | |
No. The new accounting standards required a prospective treatment. As such, the results of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 are not comparable with prior periods. We did not create non-GAAP metrics to show what results may have been absent the impact of the new accounting standards. Readers interested in additional financial information used by Fannie Mae to manage our businesses and assess our performance should refer to the segment disclosures for our three business segmentsSingle-Family, Housing and Community Development, and Capital Markets. The presentation of our segment disclosures also have been prospectively changed to include the effects of the adoption of the new standards and to align with how we manage our businesses. {See PART I, Item 2, Business Segment Results, and PART I, Item 1, Note 13Segment Reporting} |
4
5) | Does this change affect any of the operational decisions you make? | |
Yes, it may impact some operational decisions. For example, under our single-family MBS trust documents, Fannie Mae has the option to purchase from our MBS trusts loans that are delinquent as to four or more consecutive monthly payments. In February 2010, we announced that we intended to increase significantly our purchases of delinquent loans from single-family MBS trusts, and we have done so. In March 2010, we purchased approximately 216,000 delinquent loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $40 billion from MBS trusts; in April 2010, we purchased approximately 229,000 delinquent loans with an unpaid principal balance of $46 billion. We expect to continue to purchase a significant portion of our remaining delinquent loan population within a few months subject to market conditions, servicer capacity, and other constraints including the limit on the mortgage assets that we may own pursuant to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement. | ||
Prior to the adoption of the new standards, the majority of our MBS trusts were unconsolidated, with the loans recorded off-balance sheet. When acquiring a credit impaired loan from an unconsolidated MBS trust we are required to recognize a loss reflecting the difference between the fair value of the acquired loan and our acquisition cost, which is the loans unpaid principal balance plus any accrued interest. Under the new accounting standards, we have consolidated the vast majority of our MBS trusts. We are not required to recognize a fair value loss associated with the acquisition of credit-impaired loans from consolidated MBS trusts, as these loans are already recorded on our balance sheet. Without these fair value losses, the cost of purchasing most delinquent loans from Fannie Mae MBS trusts and holding them in our portfolio is less than the cost of advancing delinquent payments to holders of the Fannie Mae MBS. Our purchases of delinquent loans from consolidated MBS trusts will help Fannie Mae preserve capital, which will reduce the amount of additional draws from the U.S. Department of the Treasury. {See PART 1, Item 2, Executive Summary, Purchases from our Single-Family MBS Trusts} | ||
6) | Have you consolidated any of your resecuritization trusts, such as REMICs? | |
We have concluded that we will not consolidate resecuritization trusts except where we hold substantially all of the outstanding beneficial interests issued by the multi-class resecuritization trust. Although we guarantee that multi-class MBS certificateholders will receive timely payment of principal and interest as required by the trust, these trusts do not constitute additional credit risk because the ultimate underlying assets are MBS for which we have already provided a guaranty. Where the multi-class resecuritization trust comprises Fannie Mae MBS, we generally consolidate the underlying loan collateral of the MBS. | ||
7) | Does Fannie Mae continue to hold any assets and liabilities in off-balance-sheet entities? | |
Yes. Where we have determined that Fannie Mae does not control the entity, the associated assets and liabilities held in the entity will remain off-balance sheet. For example, Fannie Mae generally does not consolidate our MBS trusts backed by government guaranteed loans. Table 32 in our Form 10-Q, On-and Off-Balance Sheet MBS and Other |
5
Guaranty Arrangements, provides additional information on the unpaid principal balances of unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and other guarantees. | ||
8) | How do the new accounting standards affect assets, liabilities, and net worth? | |
Assets: Our total assets at March 31, 2010 are $3.3 trillion. This is an increase of $2.4 trillion over December 31, 2009 and is primarily the result of new accounting standards that went into affect on January 1, 2010. We recorded a transition adjustment on January 1, 2010 of $2.4 trillion, which primarily reflected the recording of mortgage loans held in MBS trusts on the balance sheet at their unpaid principal balance as of the transition date. | ||
Liabilities: Our total liabilities at March 31, 2010 are $3.3 trillion. This is an increase of $2.4 trillion over December 31, 2009 and is primarily the result of new accounting standards that went into affect on January 1, 2010. The new accounting standards have resulted in the recognition of the securities issued by MBS trusts held by third parties as long-term debt on Fannie Maes consolidated balance sheet which is recorded at the unpaid principal balance of the loans underlying the MBS securities. | ||
Net Worth: The transition adjustment resulted in a $3.3 billion benefit, decreasing our net worth deficit as of January 1, 2010. The transition adjustment includes a net decrease in our accumulated deficit of $6.7 billion, a net increase to our accumulated other comprehensive loss of $3.4 billion and a decrease to our noncontrolling interest of $14 million. Our net worth deficit was $8.4 billion as of March 31, 2010. | ||
9) | How has this changed the items reported on your balance sheet? | |
We have added Of Fannie Mae and Of consolidated trusts to the face of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. This provides greater clarity about our mortgage loans, accrued interest receivable, long-term debt, short-term debt and accrued interest payable. For further information on the amounts of debt outstanding Of Fannie Mae and Of consolidated trusts, readers should refer to Table 28 in our Form 10-Q. | ||
Loans: Under the new accounting standards, the transfer of mortgage loans to a trust and the sale of the related securities in a portfolio securitization transaction generally no longer qualify for sale treatment since the underlying loans and debt remain on the balance sheet after the sale has been completed. As a result, mortgage loans acquired with the intent to securitize via trusts that are consolidated are classified as held-for-investment on our consolidated balance sheets before and after they are securitized. Additionally, due to this change in accounting treatment we reclassified the majority of our held-for-sale loans to held-for-investment at the transition date. {See Note 2} | ||
Securities: While the financial statement presentation for our investments in securities has not changed, we reported a substantial decrease in our investments in securities. Because we recognized the underlying assets of our consolidated MBS trusts, we derecognized any Fannie Mae MBS we owned that were issued by the consolidated |
6
trusts, which, at the transition date resulted in a net decrease of $189 billion in our investments in MBS that are classified as trading and available-for-sale securities. Purchases of Fannie Mae MBS are no longer reported as assets, but instead reduce the debt reported on our consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, when we purchase Fannie Mae MBS issued by a consolidated trust, we account for the transaction in the consolidated financial statements as debt extinguishment; when we sell Fannie Mae MBS issued by consolidated trusts, we account for the transaction as issuance of debt by consolidated trusts. {See Note 2} | ||
Guaranty Asset and Liability: For trusts that are not consolidated by us, and other guarantees that are not impacted by the new accounting standards, we continue to recognize at inception a guaranty obligation, representing our obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guaranty, as well as a guaranty asset, representing the present value of cash flows expected to be received as compensation over the life of the guaranty. However, for consolidated trusts, our guaranty to the trust represents intracompany activity that must be eliminated for purposes of our consolidated financial statements. Thus, upon consolidation of a trust, we derecognize the related guaranty asset and guaranty obligation from our condensed consolidated balance sheets. | ||
10) | What is the effect on your statement of operations? | |
Guaranty Fee Income: Although we continue to serve as guarantor of timely payments of principal and interest on our MBS trusts, we do not recognize guaranty fee income from trusts that we consolidate. Instead, guaranty fees from consolidated trusts (contractual guaranty fees and the amortization of deferred cash fees received after December 31, 2009) are reported as a component of interest income on mortgage loans. For consolidated trusts, our guaranty related assets and liabilities recorded through December 31, 2009 were recognized into our total deficit upon the adoption of the new accounting standards, therefore we no longer recognize income or loss from amortizing these assets and liabilities nor recognize changes in their fair value. The guaranty fee income that we continue to report relates to guarantees to unconsolidated trusts and other credit enhancements that we have provided. | ||
Interest Income: The interest income earned on mortgage loans held by the newly consolidated trusts is recorded in our condensed consolidated statement of operations as loan interest income. This interest income was not recorded on our condensed consolidated statement of operations prior to the transition date as the trusts were considered off-balance sheet. | ||
Prior to our adoption of the new accounting standards, we reported interest income on mortgage loans held by us and by trusts we consolidated (because we owned all or a significant portion of the MBS issued by the MBS trust), collectively as Interest income on mortgage loans. Effective at the transition date, we report Interest income on mortgage loans of Fannie Mae and Interest income on mortgage loans held by consolidated trusts. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to our current period presentation. |
7
Although virtually all revenue that would previously have been recorded as guaranty fee income is now recorded a component of net interest income, net interest income decreased in the first quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2009. This decrease primarily reflects the fact that we do not recognize interest income on nonperforming loans delinquent more than 60 days on our balance sheet. Because the amount of these loans on our balance sheet increased with consolidation, we saw a significant increase in interest income that was not recognized in our statement of operations. Prior to January 1, 2010, the delinquent interest payments on the loans underlying our unconsolidated MBS trusts were considered in the determination of our combined reserve for credit losses. After consolidation, our combined reserve for credit losses will no longer need to contemplate these delinquent interest payments. The unrecognized income on nonperforming loans was $2.7 billion, or 33 basis points of yield, in the first quarter of 2010 compared with $233 million, or 10 basis points of yield, in the first quarter of 2009. |
Interest Expense: The interest expense generated on debt of consolidated trusts is now recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as interest expense on short-term and long-term debt. Effective at the transition date, we report Interest expense on debt of Fannie Mae and Interest expense on debt of consolidated trusts. |
Provision for Credit Losses: We record a provision for credit losses each period so that our allowance for loan losses reflects the probable credit losses incurred, but not yet recognized, on loans recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Our provision for loan losses has been affected by the change in accounting standards in the following two ways: |
Reclassification of the Reserve for Guaranty Losses: We maintain an allowance for loan losses related to HFI loans reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and a reserve for guaranty losses related to loans held by unconsolidated trusts. Since the majority of our MBS trusts were consolidated at the transition date, we increased our Allowance for loan losses and decreased our Reserve for guaranty losses. We use a different methodology in estimating incurred losses under our allowance for loan losses than we do under our reserve for guaranty losses. We expect that this will result in lower credit-related expenses. |
Fair Value Losses: We no longer recognize the acquisition of loans from MBS trusts that we have consolidated as a purchase. At the time we acquire delinquent loans from our consolidated MBS trusts, we are not required to record a fair value loss reflecting the difference between the fair value of an acquired loan and its acquisition cost, as these loans are already reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. As a result, while we purchased significantly more delinquent loans in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, we had a significant decline in fair value losses on credit impaired loans acquired from MBS trusts. |
8
Fannie Mae 2010 First Quarter Credit Supplement May 10, 2010 |
These materials present tables and other information about Fannie Mae, including information contained in Fannie Maes Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. Some of the terms used in these materials are defined and discussed more fully in the 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. These materials should be reviewed together with the 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q, copies of which are available in the Investor Information section of Fannie Maes Web site at www.fanniemae.com. Some of the information in this presentation is based upon information that we received from third-party sources such as sellers and servicers of mortgage loans. Although we generally consider this information reliable, we do not independently verify all reported information. This presentation includes forward-looking statements relating to future home price changes. These statements are based on our opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts and other views on a variety of economic and other information, and changes in the assumptions and other information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The impact of future home price changes on our business, results or financial condition will depend on many other factors. |
Table of Contents Slide Home Price Growth/Decline Rates in the U.S. 3 Home Price Declines Peak-to-Current (by State) as of 2010 Q1 4 Fannie Mae Acquisition Profile by Key Product Features 5 Fannie Mae Credit Profile by Key Product Features 6 Fannie Mae Credit Profile by Origination Year and Key Product Features 7 Fannie Mae Single-Family Cumulative Default Rates 8 Fannie Mae Credit Profile by State 9 Fannie Mae Single-Family Serious Delinquency Rates by State and Region 10 Home Price Growth/Decline and Fannie Mae Real Estate Owned (REO) in Selected States 11 Fannie Mae Alt-A Credit Profile by Key Product Features 12 Fannie Mae Alt-A Loans Versus Loans Underlying Private-Label Alt-A Securities 13 Fannie Mae Workouts by Type 14 Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) 15 Fannie Mae Modifications of Single-Family Delinquent Loans 16 Fannie Mae Multifamily Credit Profile by Loan Attributes 17 Fannie Mae Multifamily Credit Profile by Acquisition Year 18 |
Home Price Growth/Decline Rates in the U.S. Fannie Mae Home Price Index S&P/Case-Shiller Index 9.8% 7.7% 10.6% 10.7% 14.6% 14.7% -0.3% -8.5% 18.3% -2.5% Growth rates are from period-end to period-end. * Initial estimate based on purchase transactions in Fannie-Freddie acquisition and public deed data available through the end of March 2010, supplemented by preliminary data available for April and May 2010. Including subsequent data may lead to materially different results. We expect peak-to-trough declines in home prices to be in the 18% to 23% range (comparable to a decline of 32% to 40% range using the S&P/Case-Shiller index method). Note: Our estimates differ from the S&P/Case-Shiller index in two principal ways: (1) our estimates weight expectations for each individual property by number of properties, whereas the S&P/Case-Shiller index weights expectations of home price declines based on property value, causing declines in home prices on higher priced homes to have a greater effect on the overall result; and (2) our estimates do not include known sales of foreclosed homes because we believe that differing maintenance practices and the forced nature of the sales make foreclosed home prices less representative of market values, whereas the S&P/Case-Shiller index includes sales of foreclosed homes. The S&P/Case Shiller comparison numbers shown above for the peak-to-trough forecast are calculated using our models and assumptions, but modified to use these two factors (weighting of expectations based on property value and the inclusion of foreclosed property sales). In addition to these differences, our estimates are based on our own internally available data combined with publicly available data, and are therefore based on data collected nationwide, whereas the S&P/Case-Shiller index is based only on publicly available data, which may be limited in certain geographic areas of the co untry. Our comparative calculations to the S&P/Case-Shiller index provided above are not modified to account for this data pool difference. 3 |
Home Price Declines Peak-to-Current (by State) as of 2010 Q1 Top %: State/Region Home Price Decline Rate % from applicable peak in that state through March 31, 2010 -Bottom %: % of Fannie Mae single-family conventional guaranty book of business by unpaid principal balance as of March 31, 2010 Note: Regional home price decline percentages are a housing stock unit-weighted average of home price decline percentages of states within each region. Initial estimate based on purchase transactions in Fannie-Freddie acquisition and public deed data available through the end of March 2010, supplemented by preliminary data available for April and May 2010. Including subsequent data may lead to materially different results. 4 |
Fannie Mae Acquisition Profile by Key Product Features Credit Characteristics of Single-Family Business Volume (1) Acquisition Year 2010 Q1 2009 2008 2007 2006 Unpaid Principal Balance (billions) $116.0 $684.7 $557.2 $643.8 $515.8 Weighted Average Origination Note Rate 4.89% 4.93% 6.00% 6.51% 6.45% Original Loan-to-Value Ratio = 60% 30.4% 32.6% 22.7% 16.7% 18.6% 60% and = 70% 15.5% 17.0% 16.1% 13.5% 15.1% 70% and = 80% 37.3% 39.9% 39.5% 44.7% 49.6% 80% and = 90% 9.4% 6.9% 11.7% 9.1% 6.8% 90% and = 100% 5.6% 3.3% 10.0% 15.8% 9.7% 100% 1.8% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 68.5% 66.8% 72.0% 75.5% 73.4% FICO Scores (2) 0 to 620 0.7% 0.4% 2.8% 6.4% 6.2% = 620 and 660 2.1% 1.5% 5.7% 11.5% 11.2% =660 and 700 7.8% 6.5% 13.9% 19.2% 19.6% =700 and 740 17.8% 17.2% 21.7% 22.6% 23.0% =740 71.5% 74.4% 55.8% 40.1% 39.7% Missing 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% Weighted Average FICO (2) 758 761 738 716 716 Product Fixed-rate 92.0% 96.6% 91.7% 90.1% 83.4% Adjustable-rate 8.0% 3.4% 8.3% 9.9% 16.6% Alt-A 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 16.7% 21.8% Subprime 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 0.7% Interest Only 2.2% 1.0% 5.6% 15.2% 15.2% Negative Amortizing 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 3.1% Refinance 78.5% 79.9% 58.6% 50.4% 48.3% HARP (3) 11.9% 3.8% HARP Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio (3) 91.7% 90.7% Investor 4.9% 2.5% 5.6% 6.5% 7.0% Condo/Co-op 10.0% 8.2% 10.3% 10.4% 10.5% (1) Percentage calculated based on unpaid principal balance of loans at time of acquisition. Single-family business volume refers to both single-family mortgage loans we purchase for our mortgage portfolio and single-family mortgage loans we securitize into Fannie Mae MBS. (2) FICO Credit scores reported in the table are those provided by the sellers of the mortgage loans at time of delivery. (3) The Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) started in April 2009. |
Fannie Mae Credit Profile by Key Product Features Credit Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business Categories Not Mutually Exclusive (1) Loans with Loans with Negative Loans with Loans with Sub-total of Interest Original FICO 620 and Overall As of March 31, 2010 Amortizing FICO FICO 620 Alt-A Loans Subprime Key Product Only Loans LTV Ratio Original LTV Loans Book Loans 620 (3) and 660 (3) Features (1) 90% Ratio 90% (3) Unpaid Principal Balance (billions) (2) $13.0 $177.3 $107.0 $225.1 $262.8 $23.4 $238.3 $7.2 $821.2 $2,797.6 Share of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book 0.5% 6.3% 3.8% 8.0% 9.4% 0.8% 8.5% 0.3% 29.4% 100.0% Average Unpaid Principal Balance (2) $128,617 $243,452 $123,789 $138,534 $144,817 $118,474 $165,907 $148,830 $152,136 $153,780 Serious Delinquency Rate 10.09% 20.82% 17.86% 13.20% 12.93% 26.94% 16.22% 31.47% 13.13% 5.47% Origination Years 2005-2007 59.7% 77.7% 54.8% 52.6% 51.4% 68.2% 73.4% 80.5% 57.6% 34.3% Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 71.2% 75.5% 76.6% 77.3% 97.2% 98.1% 73.0% 77.2% 79.7% 71.3% Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 90% 0.3% 9.1% 21.9% 20.7% 100.0% 100.0% 5.4% 6.8% 32.0% 9.4% Weighted Average Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 99.7% 108.5% 84.0% 85.8% 105.8% 106.5% 94.1% 99.6% 92.8% 75.9% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 100% and = 125% 14.3% 23.9% 15.6% 15.6% 32.7% 35.0% 16.3% 20.2% 19.9% 9.5% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 125% 34.5% 27.1% 9.2% 10.7% 15.8% 16.8% 18.8% 18.5% 14.1% 6.3% Weighted Average FICO (3) 706 725 588 641 700 592 717 622 687 731 FICO 620 (3) 7.4% 1.3% 100.0% 8.9% 100.0% 0.7% 48.6% 13.0% 3.8% Fixed-rate 0.3% 38.1% 91.2% 90.9% 93.2% 91.9% 71.6% 76.5% 80.2% 91.2% Primary Residence 69.0% 85.0% 96.7% 94.2% 97.0% 99.4% 77.2% 96.6% 89.6% 89.9% Condo/Co-op 14.1% 16.5% 4.9% 6.6% 9.9% 6.0% 10.9% 4.4% 9.7% 9.4% Credit Enhanced (4) 67.1% 24.4% 32.0% 32.3% 85.4% 91.1% 27.6% 59.9% 39.6% 16.8% % of 2007 Credit Losses (5) 0.9% 15.0% 18.8% 21.9% 17.4% 6.4% 27.8% 1.0% 72.3% 100.0% % of 2008 Credit Losses (5) 2.9% 34.2% 11.8% 17.4% 21.3% 5.4% 45.6% 2.0% 81.3% 100.0% % of 2009 Credit Losses (5) 2.0% 32.6% 8.8% 15.5% 19.2% 3.4% 39.6% 1.5% 75.0% 100.0% % of 2009 Q1 Credit Losses (5) 1.8% 34.2% 10.7% 16.0% 22.5% 4.9% 39.2% 2.0% 77.7% 100.0% % of 2009 Q2 Credit Losses (5) 2.2% 32.2% 9.2% 16.0% 19.7% 3.5% 41.2% 1.1% 76.0% 100.0% % of 2009 Q3 Credit Losses (5) 1.8% 31.8% 8.6% 15.3% 18.9% 3.2% 39.1% 1.6% 74.4% 100.0% % of 2009 Q4 Credit Losses (5) 2.0% 32.6% 7.7% 15.1% 17.1% 2.6% 39.0% 1.3% 73.2% 100.0% % of 2010 Q1 Credit Losses (5) 2.6% 30.7% 7.1% 14.1% 16.3% 2.5% 36.5% 1.0% 70.3% 100.0% (1) Loans with multiple product features are included in all applicable categories. The subtotal is calculated by counting a loan only once even if it is included in multiple categories. (2) Excludes non-Fannie Mae securities held in portfolio and those Alt-A and subprime wraps for which Fannie Mae does not have loan-level information. Fannie Mae had access to detailed loan-level information which constituted over 99% of its single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (3) FICO Credit scores reported in the table are those provided by the sellers of the mortgage loans at time of delivery. (4) Unpaid principal balance of all loans with credit enhancement as a percentage of unpaid principal balance of single-family conventional guaranty book of business for which Fannie Mae had access to loan level information. Includes primary mortgage insurance, pool insurance, lender recourse and other credit enhancement. (5) Expressed as a percentage of credit losses for the single-family guaranty book of business. For information on total credit losses, refer to Fannie Maes 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. 6 |
Fannie Mae Credit Profile by Origination Year and Key Product Features Credit Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business by Origination Year Origination Year Overall 2004 and As of March 31, 2010 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Book Earlier Unpaid Principal Balance (billions) (1) $2,797.6 $61.7 $660.4 $334.2 $401.8 $277.8 $280.6 $781.2 Share of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book 100.0% 2.2% 23.6% 11.9% 14.4% 9.9% 10.0% 27.9% Average Unpaid Principal Balance (1) $153,780 $219,774 $216,324 $193,161 $183,158 $167,729 $156,345 $104,375 Serious Delinquency Rate 5.47% 0.00% 0.08% 4.51% 14.85% 13.42% 7.58% 3.08% Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 71.3% 68.7% 67.0% 73.4% 77.6% 74.8% 72.3% 69.3% Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 90% 9.4% 8.3% 4.0% 10.8% 19.7% 11.7% 8.4% 7.7% Weighted Average Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 75.9% 68.5% 67.9% 81.5% 99.4% 100.0% 86.5% 56.5% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 100% and = 125% 9.5% 2.2% 1.2% 13.3% 23.8% 18.8% 13.6% 3.3% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 125% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 16.5% 19.8% 11.8% 1.3% Weighted Average FICO (2) 731 757 761 736 709 712 720 722 FICO 620 (2) 3.8% 0.8% 0.4% 2.6% 7.3% 6.0% 4.5% 4.7% Interest Only 6.3% 2.0% 1.0% 5.5% 15.4% 17.2% 10.0% 1.7% Negative Amortizing 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 1.2% 1.4% 0.7% Fixed-rate 91.2% 93.1% 96.8% 92.7% 89.4% 84.9% 83.6% 91.5% Primary Residence 89.9% 90.3% 92.7% 88.3% 88.2% 86.4% 87.5% 91.3% Condo/Co-op 9.4% 9.5% 8.3% 11.4% 11.4% 11.7% 10.3% 7.3% Credit Enhanced (3) 16.8% 5.8% 6.6% 24.0% 31.5% 24.9% 18.5% 12.0% % of 2007 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 1.9% 21.3% 23.6% 53.2% % of 2008 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.5% 27.9% 34.9% 19.3% 17.3% % of 2009 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 4.8% 36.0% 30.9% 16.4% 11.9% % of 2009 Q1 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 2.6% 34.0% 31.7% 17.6% 14.1% % of 2009 Q2 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 4.3% 34.6% 31.7% 16.6% 12.7% % of 2009 Q3 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 5.4% 37.5% 30.3% 15.8% 11.1% % of 2009 Q4 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 6.0% 36.8% 30.4% 16.2% 10.6% % of 2010 Q1 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 0.0% 0.1% 6.6% 36.6% 30.2% 16.0% 10.6% Cumulative Default Rate (5) 0.00% 0.00% 0.57% 3.34% 3.92% 2.47% (1) Excludes non-Fannie Mae securities held in portfolio and those Alt-A and subprime wraps for which Fannie Mae does not have loan-level information. Fannie Mae had access to detailed loan-level information which constituted over 99% of its single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (2) FICO Credit scores reported in the table are those provided by the sellers of the mortgage loans at time of delivery. (3) Unpaid principal balance of all loans with credit enhancement as a percentage of unpaid principal balance of single-family conventional guaranty book of business for which Fannie Mae has access to loan-level information. Includes primary mortgage insurance, pool insurance, lender recourse and other credit enhancement. (4) Expressed as a percentage of credit losses for the single-family guaranty book of business. For information on total credit losses, refer to Fannie Maes 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. (5) Defaults include loan liquidations other than through voluntary pay-off or repurchase by lenders and includes loan foreclosures, preforeclosure sales, sales to third parties and deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Cumulative Default Rate is the total number of single-family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year that have defaulted, divided by the total number of single- family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year. For 2000 to 2004 cumulative default rates, refer to slide 8. 7 |
Fannie Mae Single-Family Cumulative Default Rates Cumulative Default Rates of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business by Origination Year Time Since Beginning of Origination Year Note: Defaults include loan liquidations other than through voluntary pay-off or repurchase by lenders and include loan foreclosures, preforeclosure sales, sales to third parties and deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Cumulative Default Rate is the total number of single-family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year that have defaulted, divided by the total number of single-family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year. Data as of March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate performance of the loans and performance is likely to change, perhaps materially, in future periods. 8 |
Fannie Mae Credit Profile by State Credit Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business by State Select Overall As of March 31, 2010 AZ CA FL NV Midwest Book (5) States Unpaid Principal Balance (billions) (1) $2,797.6 $74.8 $492.3 $192.7 $34.2 $302.0 Share of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book 100.0% 2.7% 17.6% 6.9% 1.2% 10.8% Average Unpaid Principal Balance (1) $153,780 $158,093 $215,267 $143,808 $174,628 $123,154 Serious Delinquency Rate 5.47% 8.76% 5.72% 13.27% 13.95% 5.65% Origination Years 2005-2007 34.3% 50.0% 29.4% 53.1% 53.2% 31.7% Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 71.3% 73.8% 63.6% 73.2% 74.6% 74.7% Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 90% 9.4% 10.1% 3.2% 10.4% 9.5% 12.1% Weighted Average Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 75.9% 103.2% 76.5% 103.0% 130.0% 79.5% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 100% and =125% 9.5% 19.4% 11.3% 19.1% 16.5% 13.7% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 125% 6.3% 27.5% 10.8% 28.6% 50.8% 4.4% Weighted Average FICO (2) 731 730 740 720 727 726 FICO 620 (2) 3.8% 3.2% 2.2% 5.0% 2.9% 4.7% Interest Only 6.3% 13.1% 10.1% 10.5% 18.2% 3.7% Negative Amortizing 0.5% 0.6% 1.5% 1.0% 1.6% 0.1% Fixed-rate 91.2% 86.2% 86.7% 87.4% 78.9% 91.5% Primary Residence 89.9% 83.4% 88.7% 82.0% 80.2% 93.7% Condo/Co-op 9.4% 5.2% 11.9% 15.2% 7.3% 10.7% Credit Enhanced (3) 16.8% 17.7% 8.2% 19.5% 20.5% 20.1% % of 2007 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 1.8% 7.2% 4.7% 1.2% 46.6% % of 2008 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 8.0% 25.2% 10.9% 4.9% 21.1% % of 2009 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 10.8% 24.4% 15.5% 6.5% 14.8% % of 2009 Q1 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 12.2% 26.3% 12.0% 7.2% 13.8% % of 2009 Q2 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 11.0% 24.7% 14.6% 6.3% 16.2% % of 2009 Q3 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 9.3% 23.9% 16.7% 6.9% 14.9% % of 2009 Q4 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 11.2% 23.6% 17.1% 6.0% 14.4% % of 2010 Q1 Credit Losses (4) 100.0% 10.8% 24.9% 18.0% 4.6% 14.6% (1) Excludes non-Fannie Mae securities held in portfolio and those Alt-A and subprime wraps for which Fannie Mae does not have loan-level information. Fannie Mae had access to detailed loan-level information which constituted over 99% of its single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (2) FICO Credit scores reported in the table are those provided by the sellers of the mortgage loans at time of delivery. (3) Unpaid principal balance of all loans with credit enhancement as a percentage of unpaid principal balance of single-family conventional guaranty book of business for which Fannie Mae has access to loan-level information. Includes primary mortgage insurance, pool insurance, lender recourse and other credit enhancement. (4) Expressed as a percentage of credit losses for the single-family guaranty book of business. For information on total credit losses, refer to Fannie Maes 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. (5) Select Midwest states are Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio. 9 |
Fannie Mae Single-Family Serious Delinquency Rates by State and Region (1) State March 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 March 31, 2009 Arizona 8.76% 8.80% 7.87% 6.54% 5.00% California 5.72% 5.73% 5.06% 4.23% 3.33% Florida 13.27% 12.82% 11.31% 9.71% 8.07% Nevada 13.95% 13.00% 11.16% 9.33% 7.05% Select Midwest States (2) 5.65% 5.62% 4.98% 4.16% 3.36% All conventional single-family 5.47% 5.38% 4.72% 3.94% 3.15% loans Region (3) Midwest 4.96% 4.97% 4.42% 3.71% 3.02% Northeast 4.74% 4.53% 3.91% 3.20% 2.53% Southeast 7.22% 7.06% 6.18% 5.21% 4.24% Southwest 4.17% 4.19% 3.71% 3.07% 2.45% West 5.55% 5.45% 4.77% 3.96% 3.06% All conventional single-family 5.47% 5.38% 4.72% 3.94% 3.15% loans (1) Calculated based on the number of loans in Fannie Maes single-family conventional guaranty book of business within each specified category. (2) Select Midwest states are Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio. (3) For information on which states are included in each region, refer to Fannie Maes 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. |
Home Price Growth/Decline and Fannie Mae Real Estate Owned (REO) in Selected States REO Acquisitions (Number of Properties) 5-Year REO REO Annualized 1-Year HP Inventory Inventory HP Growth Growth State as of as of April 2005 April 2009 to 2010 Q1 2009 2008 2007 March 31, March 31, to March March 2010 (1) 2010 2009 2010 (1) Arizona 5,374 12,854 5,532 751 7,779 4,826 -6.2% -2.9% California 8,700 19,565 10,624 1,681 14,676 8,207 -7.8% -0.7% Florida 6,556 13,282 6,159 1,714 9,304 3,840 -7.3% -2.1% Nevada 1,451 6,075 2,906 530 2,550 2,405 -12.8% -11.4% Select Midwest States (2) 12,058 28,464 23,668 16,678 26,389 16,127 -3.3% -1.4% All other States 27,790 65,377 45,763 27,767 49,291 26,966 0.5% -0.9% Total 61,929 145,617 94,652 49,121 109,989 62,371 -1.7% -1.1% (1) Initial estimate based on purchase transactions in Fannie-Freddie acquisition and public deed data available through the end of March 2010, supplemented by preliminary data available for April and May 2010. Including subsequent data may lead to materially different results. (2) Select Midwest states are Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio. REO Net Sales Prices Compared With Unpaid Principal Balances of Mortgage Loans 2010 Q1 2009 Q4 2009 Q3 2009 Q2 2009 Q1 2008 Q4 56% 56% 54% 54% 57% 61% |
Fannie Mae Alt-A Credit Profile by Key Product Features Credit Characteristics of Alt-A Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business by Origination Year Origination Year (2) (1) 2004 and As of March 31, 2010 Alt-A 2008 2007 2006 2005 Earlier Unpaid principal balance (billions) (3) $238.3 $6.1 $62.5 $67.1 $45.4 $57.4 Share of Alt-A 100.0% 2.5% 26.2% 28.1% 19.0% 24.1% Weighted Average Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 73.0% 67.4% 75.1% 74.2% 72.7% 70.1% Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 90% 5.4% 2.4% 8.6% 4.7% 3.3% 4.5% Weighted Average Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 94.1% 79.2% 105.5% 108.4% 97.7% 63.5% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 100% and =125% 16.3% 12.5% 22.9% 19.4% 16.5% 5.6% Mark-to-Market Loan-to-Value Ratio 125% 18.8% 4.5% 23.5% 27.6% 20.7% 3.2% Weighted Average FICO (4) 717 727 712 714 723 721 FICO 620 (4) 0.7% 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 1.4% Adjustable-rate 28.4% 11.6% 23.6% 30.9% 39.9% 23.2% Interest Only 29.6% 7.1% 38.2% 38.6% 29.5% 12.1% Negative Amortizing 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 6.6% 2.1% Investor 17.8% 18.5% 19.6% 17.3% 19.9% 14.7% Condo/Co-op 10.9% 7.0% 9.9% 11.9% 13.1% 9.4% California 22.0% 20.4% 22.3% 20.0% 20.8% 25.0% Florida 11.6% 9.3% 12.2% 13.3% 12.9% 8.2% Credit Enhanced (5) 27.6% 13.9% 25.1% 33.9% 31.8% 21.2% 2009 Q1 Serious Delinquency Rate 9.54% 4.20% 13.51% 13.67% 8.86% 3.97% 2009 Q2 Serious Delinquency Rate 11.91% 6.52% 17.05% 16.78% 10.97% 5.02% 2009 Q3 Serious Delinquency Rate 13.97% 8.72% 20.19% 19.43% 12.72% 5.95% 2009 Q4 Serious Delinquency Rate 15.63% 10.55% 22.72% 21.57% 14.24% 6.73% 2010 Q1 Serious Delinquency Rate 16.22% 11.57% 23.71% 22.26% 14.82% 7.04% % of 2007 Credit Losses (6) 27.8% 0.7% 9.8% 9.7% 7.7% % of 2008 Credit Losses (6) 45.6% 0.0% 12.4% 20.2% 9.7% 3.4% % of 2009 Credit Losses (6) 39.6% 0.4% 13.4% 15.8% 7.3% 2.7% % of 2009 Q1 Credit Losses (6) 39.2% 0.2% 12.2% 16.2% 7.7% 2.9% % of 2009 Q2 Credit Losses (6) 41.2% 0.3% 13.5% 16.9% 7.7% 2.8% % of 2009 Q3 Credit Losses (6) 39.1% 0.5% 13.7% 15.3% 7.2% 2.5% % of 2009 Q4 Credit Losses (6) 39.0% 0.6% 13.7% 15.2% 7.0% 2.5% % of 2010 Q1 Credit Losses (6) 36.5% 0.6% 12.8% 14.4% 6.5% 2.3% Cumulative Default Rate (7) 2.15% 7.28% 7.93% 5.22% (1) Alt-A mortgage loan generally refers to a mortgage loan that can be underwritten with reduced or alternative documentation than that required for a full documentation mortgage loan but may also include other alternative product features. In reporting our Alt-A exposure, we have classified mortgage loans as Alt-A if the lenders that deliver the mortgage loans to us have classified the loans as Alt- A based on documentation or other product features. We have classified private-label mortgage-related securities held in our investment portfolio as Alt-A if the securities were labeled as such when issued. (2) As a result of our decision to discontinue the purchase of newly originated Alt-A loans effective January 1, 2009, no comparable data will be provided for 2009 and 2010. (3) Excludes non-Fannie Mae securities held in portfolio and those Alt-A and subprime wraps for which Fannie Mae does not have loan-level information. Fannie Mae had access to detailed loan-level information which constituted over 99% of its single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (4) FICO Credit scores reported in the table are those provided by the sellers of the mortgage loans at time of delivery. (5) Defined as unpaid principal balance of Alt-A loans with credit enhancement as a percentage of unpaid principal balance of all Alt-A loans. At March 31, 2010, 9.7% of unpaid principal balance of Alt-A loans carried only primary mortgage insurance (no deductible), 15.5% had only pool insurance (which is generally subject to a deductible), 2.1% had primary mortgage insurance and pool insurance, and 0.4% carried other credit enhancement such as lender recourse. (6) Expressed as a percentage of credit losses for the single-family guaranty book of business. For information on total credit losses, refer to Fannie Maes 2010 Q1 Form 10-Q. (7) Defaults include loan liquidations other than through voluntary pay-off or repurchase by lenders and includes loan foreclosures, preforeclosure sales, sales to third parties and deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Cumulative Default Rate is the total number of single-family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year that have defaulted, divided by the total number of single- family conventional loans in the guaranty book of business originated in the identified year. 12 |
Fannie Mae Alt-A Loans Versus Loans Underlying Private-Label Alt-A Securities Fannie Mae Alt-A Versus Private-Label Security Conforming Alt-A Cumulative Default Rates For Fannie Mae Alt-A And Private-Label Alt-A Fannie Mae Alt-A Private-Label Alt-A For 2005, 2006 and 2007 Cohorts (2)(3) Outstanding Alt-A loans Outstanding loans in Fannie Maes Single-backing non-agency Family Guaranty Book Conforming Alt-A MBS of Business as of as of February 2010 February 2010 Rate FICO 718 709 Default Original Loan-to-Value Ratio 73% 75% Cumulative Combined Loan-to-Value Ratio at Origination (1) 77% 81% Geography California 22% 27% Florida 12% 14% Product Type Fixed-Rate 72% 51% Adjustable-Rate 28% 49% Interest Only 20% 24% Negative Amortizing 3% 20% Investor 18% 21% (1) Includes first liens and any subordinate liens present at origination. (2) The Cumulative Default Rate is based upon the number of months between the loan origination month/year and default month/year. (3) Due to low amount of Alt-A loans originated in 2008 and 2009, no comparable data has been provided for these years. Data as of February 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate performance of the loans and performance is likely to change, perhaps materially, in future periods. Note: Private-label securities data source: First American CoreLogic, LoanPerformance data, which estimates it captures 97% of Alt-A private-label securities. 13 |
Fannie Mae Workouts by Type Modifications involve changes to the original mortgage loan terms, which may include a change to the product type, interest rate, amortization term, maturity date and/or unpaid principal balance. Modifications include completed modifications made under the Administrations Home Affordable Modification Program, which was implemented beginning in March 2009, but do not reflect loans currently in trial modifications under that program. Information on Fannie Mae loans under the Home Affordable Modification Program is provided on Slide 15. Repayment plans involve plans to repay past due principal and interest over a reasonable period of time through temporarily higher monthly payments. Loans with completed repayment plans are included for loans that were at least 60 days delinquent at initiation. Forbearances involve an agreement to suspend or reduce borrower payments for a period of time. Loans with forbearance plans are included for loans that were at least 90 days delinquent at initiation. Deeds in lieu of foreclosure involve the borrowers voluntarily signing over title to the property without the added expense of a foreclosure proceeding. In a preforeclosure sale, the borrower, working with the servicer, sells the home prior to foreclosure to pay off all or part of the outstanding loan, accrued interest and other expenses from the sale proceeds. HomeSaver Advance TM are unsecured, personal loans designed to help qualified borrowers bring their delinquent mortgage loans current after a temporary financial difficulty. 14 |
Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) Fannie Mae Loans Under HAMP As of March 31, 2010 reporting period Active HAMP Trials Permanent HAMP Modification Total 296,295 79,658 Modification Structure Rate Reduction 100% 100% Term Extension 45% 43% Forbearance 22% 22% Median Monthly Principal and Interest Reduction $468 $486% of March 31, 2010 SDQ Loans (1) 22% Data Source: United States Treasury Department as reported by servicers to the system of record for the Home Affordable Modification Program. (1) Re-performance rates for modified single-family loans, including permanent HAMP modifications, are presented on Slide 16. Provides immediate payment relief to borrowers who are delinquent or in imminent risk of payment default. We require servicers to first evaluate all Fannie Mae problem loans for HAMP eligibility. If a borrower in default is not eligible for HAMP, our servicers are required to exhaust all other workout alternatives before proceeding to foreclosure. 15 |
Fannie Mae Modifications of Single-Family Delinquent Loans Change in Monthly Principal and Interest Payment Re-performance Rates of Modified of Modified Single Family Loans (1)(2) Single Family Loans (1)(3) % Current and Performing Q4 2008 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2009 3 Months post modification 55% 62% 63% 57% 78% 6 months post modification 41% 46% 50% 47% n/a 9 months post modification 32% 36% 44% n/a n/a 12 Months post modification 27% 35% n/a n/a n/a (1) Excludes loans that were classified as subprime adjustable rate mortgages that were modified into fixed rate mortgages and were current at the time of modification. Modifications include permanent modifications made under the Administrations Home Affordable Modification Program, which was implemented beginning in March 2009, but do not reflect loans currently in trial modifications under that program. Information on the Home Affordable Modification Program is provided on Slide 15. (2) Represents the change in the monthly principal and interest payment at the effective date of the modification. The monthly principal and interest payment on modified loans may vary, and may increase, during the remaining life of the loan. (3) Includes loans that paid off. 16 |
Fannie Mae Multifamily Credit Profile by Loan Attributes % of Multifamily Unpaid Principal % Seriously % of 2010 Q1 Guaranty Book of Balance (Billions) Delinquent (3) Credit Losses As of March 31, 2010 (5) Business Total Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business (1) (2) $183.5 100% 0.79% 100% Originating loan-to-value ratio: Less than or equal to 80% $173.9 95% 0.78% 95% Greater than 80% $9.6 5% 0.91% 5% Loan Size Distribution: Less than or equal to $750K $4.5 3% 1.46% 3% Greater than $750K and less than or equal to $3M $23.0 13% 1.22% 19% Greater than $3M and less than or equal to $5M $17.3 9% 1.14% 30% Greater than $5M and less than or equal to $25M $75.4 41% 0.87% 46% Greater than $25M $63.3 34% 0.39% 2% Credit Enhanced Loans: Credit Enhanced $163.7 89% 0.69% 76% Non-Credit Enhanced $19.8 11% 1.56% 24% Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS ®) Loans: (4) DUS ® $139.1 76% 0.55% 84% Remaining Book $44.4 24% 1.52% 16% Maturity Dates: Loans maturing in 2010 $3.8 2% 2.50% 7% Loans maturing in 2011 $8.4 5% 1.32% 10% Loans maturing in 2012 $15.3 8% 1.43% 1% Loans maturing in 2013 $21.1 11% 0.53% 2% Loans maturing in 2014 $15.9 9% 0.70% 12% Other $119.0 65% 0.67% 69% (1) Excludes loans that have been defeased. Defeasance is prepayment of a loan through substitution of collateral, such as Treasury securities. (2) Consists of the portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business for which we have access to detailed loan level information, which constituted over 99% of our total multifamily guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (3) Multifamily loans and securities that are 60 days or more past due. (4) Under the Delegated Underwriting and Servicing, or DUS ® product line, Fannie Mae purchases individual, newly originated mortgages from specially approved DUS lenders using DUS underwriting standards and/or DUS loan documents. Because DUS lenders generally share the risk of loss with Fannie Mae, they are able to originate, underwrite, close and service most loans without our pre-review. (5) Numbers may not sum due to rounding. 17 |
Fannie Mae Multifamily Credit Profile by Acquisition Year Multifamily SDQ Rate by Acquisition Year Cumulative Defaults by Acquisition Year Unpaid Principal Balance % of Multifamily Guaranty % Seriously % of 2010 As of March 31, 2010 (5) (Billions) Book of Business Delinquent (3) Credit Losses Total Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business (1) (2) $183.5 100% 0.79% 100% By Acquisition Year: (4) 2010 $3.2 2% 0.00% 0% 2009 $19.4 11% 0.21% 0% 2008 $33.4 18% 0.59% 10% 2007 $43.4 24% 1.37% 23% 2006 $19.5 10% 0.71% 25% 2005 $17.7 9% 0.28% 6% Prior to 2005 $47.0 26% 0.90% 37% (1) Excludes loans that have been defeased. Defeasance is prepayment of a loan through substitution of collateral, such as Treasury securities. (2) Consists of the portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business for which we have access to detailed loan level information, which constituted over 99% of our total multifamily guaranty book of business as of March 31, 2010. (3) Multifamily loans and securities that are 60 days or more past due. (4) Includes only active loans. (5) Numbers may not sum due to rounding. 18 |